Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

[lizziec]

Ok - my opinion? Pretty poor movie. Daniel Radcliffe's acting was wooden (again), Michael Gambon's accent...umm wtf? Ron Weasley was excellent but like most of the good people (mad eye, snape, the twins etc) was chronically underused, film felt disjointed because so much had been cut and if I hadn't read the book (and I know people who are planning on going who haven't) I would have been utterly confused.

Also...WHY DID HARRY TELL NO ONE ABOUT THE DEAD BODY?????!!!!!111!one

WTF?

Argh.

More posted as I think of them.

After film came back to Cants and ate curry. Was good. I'm full. Mmmmmpie....mmmm Ancient Raj *burp*

Comments

[rachypoos.livejournal.com]

i saw it in german, and the accents sounded good, maybe is better in a diff language all together cos i liked it!

Was very odd about the lack of him telling someone about Crouch's deadness, but i think they just cut everthing they possibly could out to make it a reasonable length film...if they had put everything in it would have been two films worth. wich makes sense but is also a shame.

But i sooo agree (i said it to my friend who thought i was mad tho) that if u havent read the book, dont even bother...i realised so much stuff just because I knew the book.