lizziec: (Lizzie-ben)
[personal profile] lizziec
We're all doomed :|

Hate Bush. HatehimHatehimHatehim >.<

Also: 3 Weeks :o

Date: Sat, Aug. 13th, 2005 08:44 am (UTC)

Date: Sat, Aug. 13th, 2005 12:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-pill.livejournal.com
well woppty bloody doo. threating force is only going to make it more likely iran will build a bomb. threating this kind of shit just leads to a game of who has the bigger stick, where nuck trumps all

corse, a nuke bulit and lanched from iran would probly be out of rang of the us, and eroupe. idiots all around
From: [identity profile] reggitsti.livejournal.com
Why bother sending a nuke to the US or Europe when there are tens of thousands of US and European troops in the country next door?

In anycase there are other ways of using the bomb that don't involve popping it on the end of a missle and shooting it half way round the world.

Date: Sat, Aug. 13th, 2005 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] manyfacesofjase.livejournal.com
Um...surely the US, and the UK, all have Nuclear weapons? Why can't iran have them?

Date: Sat, Aug. 13th, 2005 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] manyfacesofjase.livejournal.com
mm, i realise that, but what i don't get is why he is making such a fuss when the US has tons of nuclear stuff

Date: Sat, Aug. 13th, 2005 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reggitsti.livejournal.com
Much as alot of US foreign policy sucks and they may not have the wisest of leaders at the moment, the US is a (reasonably) stable nation bound by several nuclear treaties against things like proliferation and first use (iirc). Much the same can be said of other established nuclear powers, the UK amongst them.

The nuclear stockpiles of these nations were built up as a by-product of the cold war, and today remain an esential part of the balance of power in the world. For all their potential to cause havoc, they're actually something of stabalising force, because the idea is they will never be used. Additionally there are long established safegaurds protecting them.

The problem with any new nuclear power is that it potentially alters the balance of power, and with our already unstable world and the fact that Iran is sitting in a rather unstable region anyway, Iran's aquisition of nuclear weapons is not good for stability.

Iran isn't a particulary stable nation itself, it's been what, only about 30 years since the revolution. It's known to have had links to international terrorism, it's virtually a theocracy, and quite frankly the idea of any religion controlling nuclear weapons terrifys me.

All of the safegaurds protecting nuclear weapons in other nations may not be established, potentially leading to proliferation, accidents, and weapons going missing. These have happened in the past in some instances, weapons have gone missing, accidents have happened, some of this has had disasterous consequences, and some still might and there have been too many near misses by far.

The world doesn't need any more nukes, it already has more than enough.

January 2020

M T W T F S S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, July 15th, 2025 06:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios